PV Module Assessments Publication 2012
The first results of the testing campaign are available. Unfortunately, due to poor results, the majority of the PV makers
have decided not to disclose their names.
Click on a manufacturer's logo to find out its product's full score board.
| Rank | Company | Product | Country | Tested on | Score | ||
| 1 |
 |
SSP60-240-C | China | Mar. 2012 | Overall Score | 80% | |
| Type | Performance | Cell quality | Workmanship | ||||
| Poly-crystalline |
 |
 |
 |
||||
| 2 |
 |
Mono 190W | China | Dec. 2011 | Overall Score | 76.1% | |
| Type | Performance | Cell quality | Workmanship | ||||
| Mono-crystalline |
|
|
|
||||
| 3 |
|
Poly 240W | China | Jun. 2012 | Overall Score | 75.7% | |
| Type | Performance | Cell quality | Workmanship | ||||
| Mono-crystalline |
|
|
|
||||
| 4 |
|
Mono 190W | China | Mar. 2012 | Overall Score | 69.75% | |
| Type | Performance | Cell quality | Workmanship | ||||
| Mono-crystalline |
|
|
|
||||
| 5 |
|
Poly 235W | China | Dec. 2011 | Overall Score | 66.25% | |
| Type | Performance | Cell quality | Workmanship | ||||
| Poly-crystalline |
 |
|
|
||||